Environmental Health Perspectives recently concluded that levels of BPA in the human body drastically reduces when one changes their diet from one that is primarily based from packaged foods to one that is fresh.  This particular study took 5 families and tested their urine before and after their normal diet of packaged foods, and then again after a diet of eating fresh foods.  The decrease was incredibly significant!  This is important to know if you do eat a diet that comes in cans or plastics because the BPA that is packaging these foods is making its way into our bodies and our children’s bodies.

BPA is a hormone disrupting chemical that is especially dangerous to our children because their systems are still developing, so knowing how to avoid BPA is a key factor to good health that will benefit them for their entire lives.

Because it can be challenging to eat solely fresh foods that are not packaged (especially when you are a working parent wearing a wardrobe of other hats) it is good to know which companies are committing to phasing out of BPA altogether.  So today we are happy to bring you the work of As You Sow.

As You Sow’s Ranking Food Companies On BPA And Seeking Safer Packaging

Nearly every canned food and beverage product on the market today contains a highly controversial chemical, bisphenol A (BPA), in its lining. BPA has been linked to serious diseases and has been the focus of increasing consumer concern and regulatory restrictions. As investors, As You Sow and Green Century Capital Management (Green Century) believe companies may face financial risks from the presence of BPA in product packaging and should act quickly to eliminate the chemical to help protect shareholder value and preserve company reputations.

This report by Green Century and As You Sow builds on the first edition of Seeking Safer Packaging, published in April 2009, which ranked food and beverage companies on their efforts to address BPA in their product packaging. In this edition, the number of companies analyzed has expanded to include major U.S. retail companies that sell private-label canned products. The scoring and analysis for this report is based on a survey distributed to companies (see Appendix A & B).

Since the first publication of Seeking Safer Packaging in spring 2009, momentum to reduce exposure to BPA has increased. New scientific and investigative reports on the potential health impacts have been published, more states and localities are adopting restrictions, and consumer concern is rising. This report analyzes how companies are responding to this critical issue by disclosing information, exploring substitutes and committing to phase out BPA, and demonstrates that a growing number of companies are proactively mitigating BPA-related risks by testing and implementing substitute packaging.

The findings of this report indicate that notable progress has been made towards commercializing substitutes to BPA epoxy can linings. The overwhelming majority of companies that responded to the survey acknowledge some efforts to explore BPA-free packaging substitutes. Several have clearly become leaders by making direct company investments in identifying substitutes to BPA, and some have begun phasing out BPA from packaging. This report demonstrates that there are clear industry leaders, but unfortunately some of the largest companies are the biggest laggards in seeking substitutes to and phasing out BPA.

  • Hain Celestial (A), whose brands include Health Valley, Earth’s Best, and Westbrae Natural, ConAgra (A), which owns brands such as Chef Boyardee, Hunt’s and Healthy Choice, and H.J. Heinz (A) are the highest-scoring companies in this report. Each of these companies has started using BPA-free can linings for certain products, is committed to removing the chemical from all of its packaging products, and has a timeline to achieve this transition.
  • General Mills (B+), whose brands include Muir Glen, Progresso and Green Giant, also scores high in this report, mainly because it has committed to start using BPA-free can linings for one of its product lines (Muir Glen tomatoes). However, the company has not identified a timeline for continuing to phase out BPA from its remaining products.
  • Nestlé (B) scores high for transparency, testing of substitute packaging and a commitment to eliminate BPA from packaging within “1 to 3 years.”
  • ConAgra (A) and Campbell Soup (C), the company behind the iconic soups and other brands such as Swanson, were the most transparent in their survey responses on their extensive testing process for BPA-free can linings. ConAgra has “placed more than 40,000 cans into various test packs across
    [its] product lines. These packs have represented in excess of 380 different variables, supported by 8 coating suppliers and 4 can suppliers.” Campbell Soup has done “several hundred” tests, “with more than 500 this fiscal year alone.”
  • Sara Lee (C) and McCormick (C) are both committed to eliminating BPA from packaging but have not begun using BPA-free substitutes.
  • Whole Foods (D+), whose private-label brand is 365 Everyday Value, is the highest-scoring retailer, largely due to the company’s good transparency on this issue, but has not demonstrated that it is actively testing any BPA-free options for its private-label cans despite a commitment to eliminate the chemical from packaging.
  • Kellogg (D+) is committed to eliminating BPA from can linings and has identified an internal timeline to do so, but is not actively exploring BPA-free packaging. Dean Foods (D+) is actively working to identify substitutions by investing company resources in the effort and contracting with suppliers, but has not committed to eliminating the chemical from packaging. Costco (D), whose private-label brand is Kirkland Signature, is committed to phasing out BPA once “a safe alternative becomes readily available,” J.M. Smucker (D) is testing alternatives, and PepsiCo (D-) has “an active program to explore alternatives,” but overall, these companies lag behind their peers which are further along in the process of implementing substitutes to BPA epoxy can linings.
  • While clear leaders are emerging in the sector, many companies continue to fall short. Laggards identified by this scorecard include: Coca-Cola (F), Del Monte (F), Kraft (F), Unilever (F), Kroger (F), Safeway (F), Supervalu (F) and Wal-Mart (F). Most of these companies are exploring substitutes to BPA to some degree but do not commit to phasing out the chemical, are not funding the exploration of substitutes, and fail to sufficiently disclose information about how they are addressing consumer concern on the issue.
  • Delhaize Group (F), Hershey (F), Hormel (F), and Sysco (F) failed to respond to the survey, demonstrating a disconcerting lack of transparency on this issue.

Given rising consumer and regulatory concerns, Green Century and As You Sow recommend that all companies make significant investments in phasing out BPA from products and take aggressive action to remove it where feasible and safe substitutes exist. Companies should also increase transparency on how they are responding to consumer concerns and possible risks to shareholder value associated with the chemical. Innovative companies that are spearheading the transition to BPA-free packaging for canned goods are sending a clear message to investors that they are looking to stay ahead of the market and gain an edge over competitors.


Who Is ‘As You Sow?’

As You Sow was founded in 1992 and has grown into two programs that strive to increase corporate accountability. The Environmental Enforcement Program seeks to reduce and remove carcinogenic exposures by pursuing compliance with California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act. Our Environmental Enforcement Program has reached settlements with hundreds of companies resulting in products being relabled or reformulated to remove hazardous ingredients. Restitution secured through this work is disbursed through grants to support community-based organizations also fighting toxics contamination and exposures throughout the state.

In 1997, As You Sow launched the Corporate Social Responsibility Program (CSRP) to use shareholder advocacy and the financial markets to catalyze positive change within publicly held companies. We have led or actively participated in shareholder dialogues and resolutions moving companies towards greater environmental sustainability and social equity. This program accepts foundation grants and individual donations.

Read As You Sow’s Full Report here.

Visit As You Sow here.

And the test results done by Environmental Health Perspectives can be found here.


Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!